A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple only attempting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a scenario that many observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal prices are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.